tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post7527004372666106366..comments2023-10-28T04:29:23.782-07:00Comments on The Palin Place: Tripp and Sarah on Cable Television BEFORE he was "BORN"Allisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09280244244867361457noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-52080164487667884692011-12-02T13:42:26.509-08:002011-12-02T13:42:26.509-08:00Here is a comment that came via email. I got permi...Here is a comment that came via email. I got permission to post it in this thread. Today I changed comment settings to "anyone" can post. Let's see what happens. <br /><br />Meanwhile, good stuff below about the Tripp baby video.<br /><br />Allison,<br /><br />Is there an easier way to log in to your blog so everyone can comment. It seems only those who are on twitter and facebook can log in. So many times I have wanted to comment but can't. Several others have the same problem. Wish you had disqus so we could just go from one blog to the other. For some reason we can't get into Brad's blog either. Most of us have followed Babygate since the beginning and have much to contribute. With Disqus you can respond directly to a comment and "like" a comment.<br /><br />When I first got involved at Palingates and all that preceded them, I remember seeing a picture of Bristol leaning over the counter with "Tripp"? It was a silhouette in the the background from the front door. It was the first "image" of her and the baby we had seen, but I don't remember when it was taken. Someone else might or even have the picture, but can't log-in. I recall it was a video, as she was leaning over him and picked him up and put him back down. I do remember she had a pot on her in the outline that was visable. I remember Sarah answered the door and you could see down the dark hall of her silhouette...like she was giving him a bath. They came in the house and when they went into the kitchen, I think Bristol and baby was gone. I wonder if this was the video you were talking about that was never seen again. I never remembered seeing it again. <br /><br />Please think about Diqus or have an easier way of logging in. You would have a lot more commenters. There are many on you feedjit but very few can comment. <br />Thank you.....Mrs GunkaAllisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09280244244867361457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-55542723870144307312011-12-02T09:56:10.811-08:002011-12-02T09:56:10.811-08:00CrystalWolfLady - Bristol posted on Facebook aroun...CrystalWolfLady - Bristol posted on Facebook around January 1 last year - <br />Tripp Eason Mitchell Palin. PALIN!!!<br /><br />Then gossip sites picked it up, IM made a post, and comments flew around the internet about the name change, Levi giving up rights, child-support, etc. Levi found out via friends, Mercede let Gryphen know it wasn't true, and Gryphen posted"I might owe Levi and Apology and E! Online issued a story, too.<br /><br />Agreed that in Dec 2008 the big news was Sherry's arrest. I have some ideas about the video and CNN. Will post again later.<br /><br />First, I have to try to make commenting here easier so more people can join in the conversation. I've heard that complain from a few people and I want to fix it if I can.Allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09280244244867361457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-91374869605771013832011-12-02T09:09:20.669-08:002011-12-02T09:09:20.669-08:00@Allision, I have a kindle of Levis book but I nev...@Allision, I have a kindle of Levis book but I never finished it I will have to look for the court papers...as I remember we did discuss that how come he has one name on the BC and now Bristy was trying to change his name?<br /><br />While your looking at CNN look for the AIP special they did on Palin during the election :)<br />McGramps keep whining during the program he was going to sue them they were running a ticket tape on top.<br /><b>CNN was the ONLY station to Cover that AIP story!</b><br />And she was pretty pissed about that. I think Game Change talked about that. So I don't see her doing interview or video with CNN.<br />All I can say Allison is there was a group of us on Mudflats had been following her since the very beginning of the election. We would of known about a video on CNN with Tripp. Go back and look at Mudflats at that time, prob on the old website she has stuff archived. The only video is of the Turkey massacre, and the one she made with John Ziegler. Also check IM. The big news was Sherry's arrest on Dec. 17 or 18 of that year.crystalwolfladyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01057179813738238952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-67667517826718850442011-12-02T08:56:15.893-08:002011-12-02T08:56:15.893-08:00@B,
Then that is ANOTHER perjury! If he was born i...@B,<br />Then that is ANOTHER perjury! If he was born in Nov or later in Jan, you can't just say "Oospsie"! I got it wrong. And Levi also,too!<br />Court papers are legal documents. That's what Patrick was saying.crystalwolfladyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01057179813738238952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-920361703799508302011-12-02T05:13:55.050-08:002011-12-02T05:13:55.050-08:00B - Yes, if she was exactly 5 mos that would be th...B - Yes, if she was exactly 5 mos that would be the end of Dec. They never said exactly, it's amazing how obscure something like a due date can become with this bunch. Amazing.<br /><br /><br />CrystalWolfLady - Interesting that you say that about FOX because yesterday I included " CNN" and "December" and "2008" to my search strings of related words trying to find other references to match what BristolBaby said and what I found were commenters on sites ( where people were talking about Sherry's arrest, and Bristol being due to deliver ) saying CNN had a FIXATION on all things PALIN at that time. Plenty of comments saying "who cares" and "she's nobody, leave them alone" along with the "why does CNN keep covering these people?" It appears that CNN was the most Palin-happy network, while other coverage was dying down. Interesting, no?<br /><br />B and CrystalwolfLady - Bristol has no fear of lying in custody papers. Levi's book shows one set of filed papers where the child is called Tripp Easton Mitchell Palin (not Johnston). I'm with B - as long as Levi isn't contesting the date, no one will ever look into it.Allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09280244244867361457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-70480369252006144042011-12-01T20:51:44.918-08:002011-12-01T20:51:44.918-08:00Forget the whole "Desperate Housewives" ...Forget the whole "Desperate Housewives" angle...<br />Looks more like Palin was "TomKat" fan!!!<br /><br />Suri Cruise born April 18, 2006? {in question, as well as whether or not Katie faked her pregnancy}<br />http://tinyurl.com/7mtt3tp<br /><br />Also rumours as to whether or not Katie ran the NY marathon...<br />http://tinyurl.com/286r26<br /><br />Looks like a preview, no?~?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-8991955071318369232011-12-01T19:16:00.942-08:002011-12-01T19:16:00.942-08:00@crystalwolflady. My guess is that unless one side...@crystalwolflady. My guess is that unless one side contested the birth date stated in the custody papers, the court would not question it, and Levi seems onboard the Palin boat with the fake date.Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00529712664480394198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-42863332130158256532011-12-01T18:27:45.061-08:002011-12-01T18:27:45.061-08:00@B - Yes, that sounds right-- if we are to believe...@B - Yes, that sounds right-- if we are to believe that BP actually WAS 5 mos. at that point. This is, I guess, what we are questioning.<br /><br />In general, what might be some reasons to fudge this date about 4-6 weeks?<br /><br />First, there was the importance of keeping the birth of the child from interfering in the '08 election-- so it couldn't "happen" around that time. (See comments on earlier threads about this point)<br /><br />Secondly(counting on my fingers here), if we assume that BP was actually due in November, it means that she conceived in February. <br /> Now, let me just state, for the record, I am not sure if BP birthed Trig, but I AM SURE THAT SP DID NOT. But, assuming, just for this explanation, that BP did birth Trig, it means he was born earlier (than 4/18/08).<br />Let's say that the earliest he could have been born was...late December, 2007. Well, well.. if we are told that Tripp was "born" December 27, 2008 and that ..."Trig was Tripp before he was Trig," then maybe we have a birth date chosen for Tripp because it allows for some hanky panky with birth certificates, official documents etc.<br />Just thinkin' out loud here.conscious at lasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07949603921251341461noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-61022543580433932692011-12-01T18:09:19.384-08:002011-12-01T18:09:19.384-08:00This is interesting...but CNN/MSNBC? By then Sarah...This is interesting...but CNN/MSNBC? By then Sarah was already favoring Fox news channel?<br />Also during the Levi/Bristol "custody" hearing a paper is on file (Palingates) That Patrick said must be real date for Tripp it has Dec 27 2008.(Patrick feel free to jump in or link to it)<br />Look on Palingates b/c alot of us were thinking he was born sooner or later.<br />But Patrick seemed pretty sure this Date (on a PDF) legal form was correct.<br />Of course this was BEFORE Bristol Perjured herself in Tenn! So maybe she did also on the Legal custody forms?<br />All in all, going back and looking at everything (with all we know NOW, emails and such) is really a great idea, and thank you and Brad for doing what you guys are doing.crystalwolfladyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01057179813738238952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-54402555133193063732011-12-01T16:51:24.100-08:002011-12-01T16:51:24.100-08:00Allison, wouldn't being exactly 5 mos. on Sept...Allison, wouldn't being exactly 5 mos. on Sept. 1 as announced by McCain campaign mean 4 more months to go, or due end of Dec.? I can't wait to digest this post over the weekend when I have more time.Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00529712664480394198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-66012748764599012252011-12-01T06:49:39.050-08:002011-12-01T06:49:39.050-08:00Ivyfree - isn't it amazing they lie about birt...Ivyfree - isn't it amazing they lie about birthdays? Who else does that? I can't think of anyone. Birth YEARS yes, but days? Bizarre.Allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09280244244867361457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-43058045706992409992011-12-01T06:45:51.277-08:002011-12-01T06:45:51.277-08:00Sqrtneg1- that's an original thought, thanks f...Sqrtneg1- that's an original thought, thanks for posting.Allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09280244244867361457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-62724805132090932792011-12-01T05:00:55.436-08:002011-12-01T05:00:55.436-08:00In my experience, changing a birth date was always...In my experience, changing a birth date was always done to hide an unacceptable father. I have no inside knowledge of the Palins but it seems it would be to make Levi the father not some one else.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-6041983743533858992011-12-01T04:44:59.736-08:002011-12-01T04:44:59.736-08:00I've never understood the concealment over Bri...I've never understood the concealment over Bristol's due date. Bristol was pretty much not visible during the last trimester of her Tripp pregnancy- she was at that going-to-church video, sprinting across the ice, and then nothing. Tripp was supposed to be Sarah's "proof" that Trig was Sarah's; at that time, the April 18th 2008 date of birth wasn't being questioned, so officially announcing the Tripp birth was the only sensible way to do it. Easier, too, than lying and trying to make up a set of circumstances to fit the lie. There must be a reason for the I hear she did, no she didn't, well yes she did, mixed-up date non-announcement. <br /><br />At this point, I'm not certain if Tripp was born earlier than claimed (a lot of what you say makes sense) or later. We have Bailey claiming Bristol did not give birth April 18th and there must be a reason he was so adamant about that specific date. He also insists that Bristol is so "sweet and pure." I mean, he's obviously deceptive. <br /><br />Honestly, the most open thing in the world, What days were the babies born? and they're lying.Ivyfreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07321216500394977409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-25858773158846996332011-12-01T03:44:33.384-08:002011-12-01T03:44:33.384-08:00C@L. Contact me at thepalinplace@gmail.com.C@L. Contact me at thepalinplace@gmail.com.Allisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09280244244867361457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3405000679090821314.post-75299498522135539202011-11-30T19:15:42.356-08:002011-11-30T19:15:42.356-08:00Allison--I would like to send you an e-mail. Do yo...Allison--I would like to send you an e-mail. Do you have an address you'd like to share here?conscious at lasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07949603921251341461noreply@blogger.com