If you’ve read any recent postings here at The Palin Place, you know I believe Sue Williams was (as she presented herself to be) a person reporting first-hand reactions of people with personal connections to the Heaths.
Ms. Williams was a modern day Paul Revere, warning the lower 48 “The Stupid One’s Running! The Stupid One’s Running!” (That’s my paraphrase, of course. The actual comments from Mudflats’ thread August 30 and 31, 2008 are available for your own interpretation on my post last week, “The Insiders: MeAgain and Sue Williams.”)
Because some of what she said ran against popular belief and against what was “known” at that time, bloggers and readers questioned her facts and her credibility. General consensus in the blogging community after much discussion was that Sue couldn’t be trusted as a reliable source and she was left behind. I think that was a mistake, and today I’m focusing on why I don’t have a problem with the contradictory stuff.
Trig – Sarah’s or Bristol’s? Between her first comment and her last the very next day, Sue Williams opened her mind to the possibility that Trig was born to Bristol. How did that happen? By listening to friends of the Heaths! That’s huge.
It wasn’t by reading our blogs. It wasn’t the tons of photographic evidence we found, studied, laid side by side, and diagnosed. It wasn’t Levi slipping up on Larry King - none of that had happened yet. Sue Williams decided Trig might be Bristol’s because she listened to what insiders (Heath family friends) said the day after Sarah became the VP nominee. Wow.
Bristol was pregnant at sixteen: This is another important gem that got lost three years ago in the detritus of blog thread commentary: friends of Heaths said Bristol got pregnant when she was sixteen.
Who among us doesn’t think Bristol was pregnant at sixteen? If you’ve read any anti-Palin blog since September, 2008, you’ve seen the Alaskan First Family Christmas picture taken September 2007. Bristol was 16 in that picture. She has no waist; her dress is tight around a large stomach. That photo has been compared to the June 2007 MySpace picture from Sammy Becker’s page and the transition would make any reasonable person think it possible that the governor’s sixteen-year-old daughter was pregnant.
All Sue was saying was that she heard that Bristol got pregnant at sixteen when listening to friends of the Heaths!
All Sue was saying was that she heard that Bristol got pregnant at sixteen
They weren't talking about the Tripp pregnancy if they were people who actually knew Bristol and the Palins. Bristol was definitely seventeen when she got pregnant with Tripp, regardless of whether it was February (as I believe), March or April. So “sixteen and pregnant” doesn't match the then-current pregnancy. Sue says 16 more than once after being engrossed in gossip with close friends of the Heath. The woman was repeating what she heard from friends of the Heaths.
Sue was not part of the chosen few. She was friends with friends, and as such, she probably was a bit on the outside of it all; she probably listened without questioning, wondered but not asked, and interpreted what she heard by assuming the Palins were normal people. A fake pregnancy is not normal, she would not have been thinking in those terms purely on her own.
Two easy to understand possibilities I see here - Sue could have heard both ages, sixteen and seventeen, and not given it much thought, assuming it was the Tripp pregnancy and Bristol turned 17 somewhere along that timeline.
Or she could have wondered about the references to sixteen and pregnant and kept her thoughts to herself, not close enough to these people to pry.
Part of that scenario, could be and understandable avoidance of the subjects of abortion and adoption. If Bristol was pregnant at sixteen, but didn’t have a baby…it wasn’t Sue’s place to ask. If Bristol was pregnant at sixteen and gave up a baby, it still wasn’t Sue’s place to ask.
Sue had no business getting into questions about Bristol being pregnant at 16. Close friends of the Heaths said it, that’s all she was saying to us. I repeat: What’s important, and got lost three years ago is that friends of Heaths said Bristol got pregnant when she was sixteen.
Bristol was pregnant at seventeen. It was confusing in 2008 when SW said Bristol was pregnant at 16 and then said 17. Confusing. Some people thought the RNC pregnancy was a fake. But time proved otherwise. So Bristol was, in fact, pregnant at seventeen while her mother was running for Vice President and Sue had that right.
Still, Sue mixed and interchanged the two ages, and that says to me she hadn’t caught on that Trig was Bristol’s. She heard stories from Heath friends, and when things didn’t add up, she made reasonable assumptions – perhaps the friends misspoke, they were mistaken, or Bristol had had a birthday.
I can imagine that it was a slip when they said sixteen. They knew it was true, but they shouldn’t openly talk about it in front of Sue Williams (and perhaps others). We’ve seen Levi and his family trying to walk that line. They want to complain about the Palins but they can’t spill the beans and say – for example - Trig is Bristol’s. But they slip up, and we hear things that don’t fit the Palin/Johnston propaganda. Everyone can site one or more of these “slips.”
So if the Johnstons can’t keep from slip-ups, how could the friends have done any better while in shock from the nomination announcement? They probably slipped. Sue heard sixteen and Sue heard seventeen. It would be harder to believe she didn’t.
What Willow’s Boyfriend Knew In April
I’ve said it before. Levi’s book Dear in the Headlights contains statements that can be used to support my theory that Bristol became pregnant in February 2008. It’s all in my post “Hockey Sticks and Pregnancy Sticks.”
Email from Sarah’s now released collection, available at msnbc's website include April messages about the rumors about Bristol. One dated April 2, 2008 from Parnell to the governor has the subject “Bristol” and the simple message “That’s just sick and vicious. We bargain for some of that, but our kids??”
Since then we’ve also learned that Willow is a tattle-tale. That girl is endlessly threatening to “tell.” Bristol says it in her “memoirs” and Levi in his “tell-all.” Even in “Going Rogue,” Sarah has Willow pointing out that her mother is “porking up.” Willow has a big mouth and doesn’t show restraint. She was the one who started last year’s Facebook homophobic rant, which I refuse to link to on this blog.
So when Sue Williams said Willow’s boyfriend was talking about it in April, Sue Williams was telling it as it was. We didn’t like it, it didn’t fit with what we all thought we knew. So, we killed a potential “golden goose.”
How many semesters along was Bristol? Three! Read it below:
Look, all I can tell you is Bristol is pregnant. Have you never lived in a small town? When one hears this “rumor” (and okay, I admit, I never heard it straight from Sarah’s mouth) but have heard it from close to 20 people who are all long time friends of the family. Maybe they are all lying – and have been lying since April of this year when Willow’s boyfriend (Willow is the 8th grader) wouldn’t shut up about how Bristol was pregnant.
Bristol was in her third trimester late in August.
Bristol would have been in her third trimester if she delivered in November, and I’m going to continue to work on figuring out which November day she had Tripp. That poor kid, just like his older brother, will never get to celebrate his real birthday until we finish our work. (Don’t you feel noble?)
Levi and Bristol’s wedding plans:
Sue felt sorry for Bristol – a girl who would “be known the world over as the seventeen year old unwed – then quickly wed senior-in-high-school-homeschooled-teenage mom.”
…yesterday in Ohio…Trig’s blanket was strung across her entire abdomen and torso, but, when she walked down the stairs from the stage, in a profile shot, it was very clear to see she is well into her third trimester of her pregnancy.
It has come out in the past couple of days that she and her high school boyfriend had a quickie wedding …
This “fact” of a quickie wedding became another stumbling block people for early Truthers. Today, we have the benefit of combining the facts below to weight the likelihood that Sue at least heard there was a quickie wedding:
- · Sarah’s answer to her own out-of-wedlock pregnancy was a quickie wedding
- · Sally Heath got pregnant and then got married
- · Track’s girlfriend Britta Hanson got pregnant in late 2010 and the Palins released a photo of a supposed May 2011 wedding with no guests and not even a full complement of immediate family members. Everything about it was suspicious and to this day there is no documentation to support the Palin’s claim that it was a legal wedding.
- · Britta Hanson’s father is a minister and was reported, via the Palins to People Magazine, to have performed the wedding of Track to his bride.
- · Sarah is very religious and her church sees marriage first and foremost as a covenant with God
- · If the wedding ceremony performed by a minister for Track and Britta had no government sanction, then it is possible that Levi and Bristol had the same thing done at one time, perhaps even by the same minister.
- · Levi said he proposed to Bristol in June 2008 and she accepted.
- · Levi wore a wedding style band Bristol bought for him.
- · Levi lost the ring in the summer of 2008 and replaced it with a tattoo of Bristol’s name.
- · Bristol wore a diamond from Levi on her left ring finger
- · Mercede Johnston said on her blog that Levi and Bristol “planned to wed twice but both times failed.” (This was one month before the famous re-engagement of July 2010).
- · On August 5, 2007 Sarah sent an email to have “wedding to attend in Wasilla” added to her calendar for August 30, 2007. (This would be when Trig was still a bun in the oven. Was this one of the two times Sadie said they "planned to wed"?)
· On September 4, 2008, Sarah was the VP nominee for the Republican party. She was in over her head. She had everything to learn about international affairs. She was constantly being coiffed and clothed by professionals. Yet, she took the time to read and forwarded to staff in AK, an email with the subject line Wedding Dress.
An apparent stranger had made an offer : “Dear Governor Palin, We have heard of your daughter’s current situation and would love to provide her with one of our wedding dresses for her wedding for free…we have many customers in the same situation. Because many women find it difficult to find a dress designed for their growing shapes…”
See? A wedding (very soon) was not out of the realm of possibility even though Sue W had heard it was a recently done deal.
· Maybe I dreamed this one, because I can’t find it now, but I recall that there was one email in the bunch released from the Palin administration days, that was written by Sarah suggesting (to Todd, most likely) that the kids get married on August 29, 2008 – the Palin’s anniversary.
· In Game Change by Heilemann and Halperin, we learn “The first thing Palin told [the attorney hired by McCain to vet VP candidates] on the phone that Wednesday night concerned a matter that she’d left off her questionnaire (and neglected to tell Schmidt and Salter [McCain’s senior staffers who met with her in Arizona]. Her teenage daughter, Bristol, was pregnant out of wedlock. “Is she getting married?” he asked, then added, jokingly, “Is she getting married tomorrow?” (pg 362)
When I look at all of that, I have no issue with Sue Williams’ saying she heard there was a quickie wedding. Gossip isn’t science, but it usually has roots in some amount of truth. The marriage rumors had roots in Palin/Heath family values and in things Sarah very likely shared with close family and friends. Right down to that “funny” comment by the vetter. Bet old Chuck Heath got a chuckle out of that and repeated it for an audience. What a guy, that Chuck.
I have no problem with Sue Williams AT ALL. Makes me want to take another look at MeAgain. But not until Sue’s posts are done. And that won’t be until I’ve covered CBJ and TRIG.
Hope you enjoyed this. Comments and add-ons and ideas welcome!
More to come.
17 comments:
Allison,
You say "Levi lost the ring in the summer of 2008 and replaced it with a tattoo of Bristol’s name."
Is this the same ring that we saw Levi wearing on his thumb in the photo of Levi with a newborn that appeared on the Greta interview with Bristol in February 2009? If it is, how can the baby shown be born *after* the ring was lost?
Here's a link to the photo I'm talking about:
Levi with newborn
Another ring sighting: The Esquire writer in Dec. 2008 comments on the wedding ring Levi wears on his thumb. Molly jokes about it. Levi was living with Bristol at Sarah's house. Bristol was ostensibly pregnant, though under your timeline Levi was there to help with Tripp.
There could have been a marriage, without a license, almost a year before. I can imagine Heaths reassuring friends that their pregnant granddaughter had married the dad, and then later telling them that the paperwork never got filed so they didn't need a divorce.
The Palintologists have spent much time and words over whether there were Two Babies, Ruffles and Trig, or then whether there were Two Trigs on the national scene. Perhaps the Two Babies that matter are Trig and Tripp; they have certainly confused Bristol's timelines.
My only reservation with believing Sue spoke with "friends of the heaths" is that there are a TON of people who claim closeness to the family when it simply isn't true. This is how so many lies made their way into Joe and Geoff's books about the family. And the reason Gryphen reports so many ridiculous rumors as fact.
It is fact Todd and Sarah were absolutely desperate to find a way to end Bristol and Levi's relationship in late 07. They sent her to Anch with hopes theyd break up, and the two did break up temporarily.
I've personally never heard any of the Johnstons slip up on anything. Sadie and Sherry believed Trig was Sarahs until recently according to Gryphen. and I dont trust shit from Levi, never have. Everything he's done is for money. He was stupid. I don't trust stupid people. The moment he lied and said Sarah called her son retarded was the moment he ended any chance of a decent relationship with Tripp until the kid turns 18. I don't feel bad for him.
Allison-- Great Post!!!
@ 54321 or whatever your screen name is--
How do YOU "know" all of these things about the Palins?
BicPent, that ring on the thumb in the Tripp birth picture is (I'm guessing) a second ring because his first one fit his ring finger. It's visible in the Trig in the hospital picture where we are supposed to believe the young man Levi wearing a wedding ring and an A & F t-shirt is only the "i only met him once or twice" boyfriend of the oldest daughter of the woman who had just given birth at 6am. (If you believe that, you probably believe she said "thanks but no thanks" to a certain bridge.)
Hey, wait a minute! If Levi was wearing the wedding ring when Trig was born, but he and Bristol supposedly didn't know she was pregnant, then wasn't that kind of weird? Even for Palins?
Bristol makes the claim all through her book that she is not the jealous type, but the actions she describes scream the opposite. That was one very jealous, suspicious, controlling girlfriend. Her pattern continued with all the guys she talked about having "dated" since Levi. Very controlling.
My best guess is that Levi's tatoo wasn't enough to make Bristol feel secure. She probably wanted him wearing a more traditional ring. And the second one was too big, hence we see it on his thumb.
I don't have Levi's book with me, but I will look back through it for any clues to the rings.
Hello B, always great to hear your thoughts. Yes, the Esquire ring was a thumb ring. What do you think of the two ring theory (above comment to BicPent)?
We sure do agree a lot.
Trig and Tripp, they are the two babies I'm going to concentrate on. They are beginning to look more like brothers to me all the time.
557 There are a couple more things about Sue's knowledge that point to very, very insider information. As in immediate family. Stay tuned.
If you want to hear Levi slip and fumble, find the Larry King Live interview on YouTube. The show aired April 22, 2009. Levi almost says Bristol was sixteen when she got pregnant, he stops himself at "si-" and then says "eighteen." Watch his eyes. He knows he messed up. She wasn't eighteen when they told her parents she was pregnant. But I bet the first time, she was sixteen. Just sayin'
Consious at Last - glad to know you've been here. I hope 557 will answer you and continue this dialogue. I'll be watching, too.
Great post Allison. I'm enjoying your blog. Keep up the good work!
Thank you Manxmamma!
@Allison. I agree with you about the second ring.
Allison-
Here are some random thoughts and suggestions:
First, over the past few years, there have been some questions about Bristol's true age-- specifically was she born in October, 1990 or October, 1991? I remember a discussion about this on the blogs.
Secondly, at the time that Sue Williams was making these comments, Aug-Sept 2008, something else was going on re: Sarah Palin. There were two separate bloggers who already had most of the real babygate story --
ArcXIX (originally at DailyKos)
http://bellaciao.org/en/spip.php?article17293
and someone called Cajunboy
http://cajunboyinthecity.blogspot.com/2008/09/im-sorry-feel-from-to-call-me-crazy-but.html
It seems like there is something to be learned here as well.
counsious at last - I'm going to see what I can find with these new/old leads. If you (or anyone) find anything, please email links to me at thepalinplace@gmail.com or post them here so everyone can help find a way crack this open.
The Palins think we have no lives if we are so busy looking at theirs. Ha! They made themselves celebrities, we made ourselves sleuths. I'm glad I'm me.
Cajunboy had a source in the AK media, didn't he? I think we speculated it might be Lisa Demer.
I truly believe that Bristol is the mother of Trig. Born either late Dec. or Jan. Bristol could have gotten pregnant again at any time after that. My question is about your Tripp theory. Why would Sarah push ahead his birth date? Wasn't her story that Bristol could not be Trig's mom because she was pregnant when Trig was born?
@ carrie- It was because the GOP campaign in '08 would not have wanted BP to "give birth' before the election. It would have been a big distraction from McCain and a loud statement that teen pregnancy is OK... or that somehow the McCain campaign celebrates teen pregnancy. After all, if they announced that BP gave birth, yet did not show excitement, joy, love and good will, they'd appear cold..... but if they did show joy, etc., they'd appear as if it was OK ...family values crowd would not be pleased... Remember, the point was to focus on TRIG not BP's (2nd?) baby.
The comment below came through my email. It's from a reader who had problems posting, but said it was okay if I posted it. This came in after a previous post,and I'm posting on more than one comment thread. Here it is:
I remember these blogs - interesting that the photos of Bristol that were laid out have all 'been disappeared'.
http://bellaciao.org/en/spip.php?article17293 I remember this also - I took note of this "Checking with the Anchorage High School that Bristol Palin attended, reporters were given word that her family had taken Bristol out of school due to contracting infectious mononucleosis. The amount of time Bristol was absent shifts from five to eight months." Since that time, bloggers everywhere have insisted this info was incorrect and made up. I find it interesting that reporters claim they were told this by the HS. Obviously, the HS was told this by the Palins. Who knows what excuses they give for not having the Palin kids in school. None of them attend/attended regularly. In our local schools 6 absent days per semester is an automatic fail for the year, no exceptions. Track didn't go to school - rumor said he was in rehab in another state. Bristol didn't attend since 10th grade. Willow doesn't attend school and hasn't for years. Piper Diaper is consistently absent.
also interesting is Cajunboy's comment - " Despite the fact that she is leaking amniotic fluid, the doctor induces labor, on a premature special needs child mind you, and she gives birth 18 1/2 hours later. The record of the child's birth is completely omitted from the hospital's website."
where did he get the 18 1/2 hours version???? was this the original story?
thought she flew all day to arrive at Mat-Su around midnight, and gave birth approximately 6-6:30 AM and Levi helped....pffffft. Mercede took the pictures (according to Scharlotte).
I have to agree with commenters on his blog though - he was hot on the trail and right on!
No doubt that SP counts on confusion to clear her guilt.
I'm so sick of this family. I wish she'd be exposed for the liar she is. If it means exposing filth - whether incest or prostitution, drug sales or production, who cares??? FOX should be happy and the general media should be happy because sales will be up again when the retard's name (Sarah Palin) is brought up.
Feel free to post my comments on your page - I've tried to sign up to comment but can't seem to figure it out - my computer just freezes and locks down.
thanks so much for keeping up with your blog - happy reader
Post a Comment