Monday, December 12, 2011

Lessons in American History : Sarah Palin, Richard Nixon, Joe McCarthy

Readers of this blog know I write because I am convinced it is important to continue to raise the issues of fraud perpetrated by Palin and McCain/Palin to keep pressure on the Republican Party and the media. Underlying my work is the belief that the former governor of Alaska, who quit before finishing one term, has been an extraordinarily divisive force in this country. 




Remember hearing about Joe McCarthy or Richard Nixon? Well, add the name Sarah Palin to that list.

Each in his or her own time, wrapped themselves in the American flag (figuratively speaking) and used their political influence to pit some Americans against other Americans, step on the rights of citizens with whom they disagreed, and used the Constitution as their weapon of choice in battles against evil as defined by them and others like them.

Yes, Sarah Palin has a place in history. Will we, as a nation, somehow learn from these years, will historians point to the McCain/Palin ticket as having ushered in a rebirth of the late 60s unrest and the mid-fifties witch hunts?  The Tea Party Conservatives want to take their country back. Back to that?

Here's an R. Crumb cartoon from an "underground" comic circa 1972; it could be about Occupy Wall Street today.









Now compare that with today's events. Occupy Wall Street protesters are being arrested.  What happened to the right to assemble and to freedom of speech.  Sarah takes the stage and yells out "America, do you love your freedom?"  But has she tweeted one word of support to OWS? I don't think so.

And how about the treatment independent filmmaker (2011 release Sarah Palin, You Betcha!) Nick Broomfield got when he and his staff arrived in the US via the Seattle airport?  The name Sarah Palin turned what should have been a civil welcome to our UK visitors into a veritable nightmare complete with bullying and physical assault. This is from his recent article in the Daily Mail :


October 24, 2010: ...Everything is going fine at Seattle airport until they find out we are doing a film about Sarah Palin. The authorities go mad. They search our bags and detain my two researchers. [My assistant] Sarah, 22, is subjected to a urine test against her wishes – just in case she is pregnant and tries to get citizenship by giving birth on US soil. Her colleague Mark is spreadeagled against the wall and given a rectal search before being handcuffed. The 25-year-old spends the night on a filthy floor littered with cigarette butts. They are both sent back to England, supposedly because they don’t have the right visas.




So the next time Sarah Palin takes the stage and shouts “America, do you love your freedoms?” (and she will be on stages again, all too soon) and follows shortly with patriotic blather about veterans and of course, pats herself on the back for Track having worn the uniform of the United States Army, resist the impulse to turn away, and instead, look at it as a history lesson.  Listen and watch as the crowd cheers. This is a lesson for your children's children. In the past, feelings of pride in America and feelings of paranoia in a leader have converged to make patriotism a social weapon. That's what I'm seeing on the stage at the Republican debates. It became fashionable all over again when accessorized with a pair of red Naughty Monkey pumps.

I'm proud of my country. But I'm not proud of some of our behavior. I'm not proud of the uniformed personnel using mace on peaceful student sit-ins or pepper-spraying an octogenarian. I'm not proud of our Seattle airport personnel, and I'm not proud that Sarah Palin was chosen to run  for VP. 

I’m all for freedom of speech. I'm exercising my right to freedom of speech as I write this today. But I don't believe that putting crosshairs over political opponents' locations and publishing a map of targets is a wise application of that freedom. 

I appreciate the military men and women. My son-in-law served seven years post-911. Where I have a problem with Sarah Palin, is that her brand of freedom is not for everyone. It’s only for everyone who agrees with her.  I have a problem with a person who says our men and women in service overseas are  “Patriots” and then stays totally silent when an audience at a Republican candidate debate is shown a video clip of a soldier and boos loudly upon learning he is gay. I have a problem with that. You betcha.

No, I don’t blame Sarah Palin for all of this. It existed before she became a celebrity. However, she chose to use her celebrity to promote divisiveness, even hate. Sarah Palin is near-sighted and self-absorbed. Books by Dunn, Bailey and McGinnis provided example after example so I don’t have to. Nick Broomfield provides a new account  to us in the Daily Mail, and I'm disgusted.

Sarah Palin has a place in history. Period. Like it or not, our children’s children will hear her name. But what will the story of Sarah Palin be after historians have a decade or two to analyze it? Will we somehow, as a nation, learn from these years and these experiences and become better and stronger because of lessons learned from McCain’s Folly? Or will this be one of the points historians see as lacking civility and a time when freedom, honesty, and democracy had a precipitous decline. Remember, it’s happened before. There was the Joe McCarthy era. And we elected Richard Nixon to four more years. 

Thank God we did not elect McCain/Palin for even one term. It's bad enough that she didn't go away and that he didn't make good on his election night promise to support this president in a bi-partisan way. Country First - what a joke. About as funny as an R. Crumb comic called "Four More Years." 

(Post script:  R. Crumb may have known that the song "God Bless America" was a tool used by politicians in the late depression-era. My Thanksgiving post, "This Land Was Made for YOU and ME," provided that bit of history, because it was part of the reason Arlo Gutherie penned the words to the  classic folk song, "This Land is Your Land.")

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

That Broomfield story isn't true. Yvonne B told it to paint a bad light. I've communicated with Nick several times. I know for a fact it isn't accurate, I know this from Nock himself.

Also, keep in mind that the american peoples beef is not with Wall Street, as OWS protesters emotionally scream out. It is with DC. The tea party peaceful and legal protests had it right. Lawmakers give wall street their power. Vote them out to really change things.

Oh and that SVU "debacle" was a disgusting measure. OWS wrongly assumed SVU was mocking them with a show built around the movement. 1. SVU doesn't mock things. 2. The episode entitled "official story" has nothing to do with the movement. 3. SVU uses present day events to make its episodes relevant. 4. The real OWS trashed the hot set and even stole stuff.

Mature.

All of the above is 100% true. Allison, I will email you some things that corroborate the Broomfield Seattle lie.

T L care said...

Wow. Did you really just quote the DAILY MAIL? Wasn't that the site that reported the gay affair between obama and sinclair in a limo? And a bunch of insanely dramatic stories that read like the writer gets paid on his creativity level?

I think the country will have a shot at improving when people stop treating repubs and dems different. Ie stop ignoring demcrats lies and actually vet your candidates.

It's interesting to me that the majority of progressives scream out "don't push your religious bs on me" yet they feel the need to mock or show disdain for some people based on personal decisions.

This is why at present I cannot support the demcratic party. That and there are way too many interviews where people say they think governments job is to find them a job and be their keeper. Ugh.

Allison said...

Anon@1:51. I'll watch for your email- send it to thepalinplace@gmail.com. (I'm working from my phone and will check in an hour or two at the most). Appreciate your help.

AKRNHSNC said...

Where do you get your ridiculous, unproven ideas from? I've never heard anyone say that the gov't exists to find them a job and be their keeper. However, I have heard RW'ers complain that President Obama hasn't increased the number of jobs enough during his first term, so which is it? Is the gov't supposed to provide jobs or not? And, if not, why are the RW'ers complaining about the number of jobs produced during the past 3 years?

The Democratic party does vet their candidates. In fact, despite the lies published, President Obama was vetted and it was done over a two year period from the day he said he was going to run for President until the day he took office. The only person that I know of that wasn't vetted was Palin and that holds true today. The dirt on her has yet to be told by the mainstream media in the same manner they have done to other candidates, both R & D. Her past is littered with one mishap after another, more hypocrisy than I thought could be attributed to one person and a pile of bodies she has left behind her-the very people who helped her rise on the political scene.

Like most progressives, I have no problem with people practicing their faith, just don't try to push it onto anyone else. Why should we have Christian symbols of faith in gov't buildings but no other religion? Our country was NOT founded on the Christian religion despite the lies of the RWNJ's like Bachmann, Demint, King, etc. Nobody is mocked for their faith unless they are hypocrites and I've seen plenty of those on the "right". They love their unborn babies but once born, they don't give a damn if the child has healthcare insurance or enough food to eat. Get your facts straight.

shaytripp said...

Allison hang in there! I have noticed I have zero negative comments at my blog as of late. Not sure what that means. No I am not deleting them. I think since I started the blog I have deletd less than 20 comments due to their inappropriate content. Hang in there and keep writing!!

Anonymous said...

Applause @ 5:19

GinaM said...

Get em' AKRNHSNC! Looks like Dirty's paid trolls are hanging out on different blogs today...saw a crazy one on AlaskaWTF reality show post...

They crack me up every time they say we are jealous of the crazy woman. Personally I like having all my faculties and my husband doesn't have to carry my purse because I pay him to stay with me! HeHe

And Shay...congrats on your book signing...I believe I will purchase your book....take that Gov Dirty Wig!

Anonymous said...

Is there a way to send you things without posting for all to see?

Jo said...

Allison, I think that this is your finest post so far. I really appreciate how you try and put Sarah Palin and the OWS movement into a historical context. In a way it is reassuring, because it is a reminder that our country has seen troubled times before and survived, rebounded, and flourished even. Let us hope that happens again.
Thank you for this blog and for keeping at the Palin saga. I think that it is so important, especially as so many others have gone by the wayside.

Allison said...

This is great! Different points all well argued. For those interested in even more discussion of the Nick B story, you can find a variety of opinions, information and thoughts at Immoral Minority. Search for a post that went up on Sunday.

Allison said...

Anon@8:10 pm. My email is thepalinplace@gmail.com and you should feel free to use it as often as you want. Others have asked that same question. Maybe I need to mention it more often.

Anonymous said...

Put the email on your home page?